
My mother was a tradwife, a bona fide 1950s tradwife. That’s what she wanted. That’s what she got.
She cooked, she cleaned, she gave birth to three children. She breastfed them and washed their diapers. Later she played games with them and took them to the library every other week. She planted a rock garden, canned peaches, put up strawberry jam, and ironed the bedsheets. Dinner was ready when her husband came home from the office and, thanks to her daily late afternoon soak in the tub, so was she.
They Met When She Was Sixteen
My parents met when she was sixteen and he twenty-one. Years later, in her 90s, my Aunt Grace could still recall the moment. It was at a summer resort on Lake Michigan in 1933, at a square dance.
My mothers’ grandparents owned the resort, and her grandfather called the dances, accompanied by a fiddler and piano player. The men who came to those barn dances liked to stomp their feet when they danced, which caused the sawdust to bounce up from the floor.
Resorters showed up for the dances. So did the local farm folks. One summer night, my Aunt Grace and her brother Dave drove over from Scottville, a nearby farm town.
Once inside the pavilion, my father spotted my mother across the room, sitting at the edge of the dance floor.
“Your dad saw her sitting there,” my Aunt Grace told me. “A pretty little gal. Just sitting there.”

Thus began a lengthy, on-again-off-again courtship. When at last my mother announced to the women in her family — mother, sister, aunt — that she intended to marry this man, they told her she was making a mistake. A big one.
“He’ll dominate you,” they said.
Dave Falconer, they had concluded, was the kind of guy who runs things. “And he’ll run you, Tinka. He’ll dominate you. Watch out.”
But my mother had made up her mind. “That’s exactly what I want,” she told them. “I want a man who will dominate me.”
My Mother Was a 1950s Tradwife
Decades later, in the 1950s, when I was a teenager and my mother was thoroughly married to my father and ensconced in what today could be described as the cozy life of a suburban tradwife, my mother explained to me what was on her mind when she decided to marry my father.
Over the years, my best girlhood conversations with my mother tended to happen over an ironing board or at the kitchen sink. Maybe this one happened at the kitchen sink, the two of us finishing up the dinner dishes.
Kitchens with dishwashers were still a thing of the future. Our hands were dry and red from the Michigan winter air, the hot dishwater and the detergent powder we used. The last dish put away, my mother reached for the Jergens and tapped a dollop onto her palm.
As usual, my mother now had more Jergens than she needed. She took my hands between hers and rubbed the extra lotion from her hands onto mine.

Divorce, Disruption, Abandonment
Our conversation turned to love and marriage. My mother had opinions on the subject — opinions born of the disruption and abandonment she’d felt growing up with divorced parents. Too, my mother came from a long line of divorced women. Her mother, her grandmother, her great-grandmother — all had been divorced.
“There were too many divorces in my family,” she said, her voice emphatic, angry even. “I was going to get married and stay married.”
The generations of divorce would end with her.
“I told your dad he’d better know what he was getting into. When I got married, it would be for life.”
And that’s how things worked out. You could say my parents’ marriage lasted 53 years, ending with my father’s death when he was 78. Or you could say that my mother was married for life, and the union didn’t end for another 19 years, on the day she died.
A Tradwife’s Fantasy
It looks good on paper, from a distance of years, my mother’s marriage. She led the life of a classic ’50s housewife, a tradwife’s dream.
Make that a tradwife’s fantasy.
Yes, my mother had the husband, the children and the pleasures of creating house and home. And, yes, there were many parts of her life that I, as a teenager, wanted for myself — a steady husband, a houseful of children, family dinners at a dining room table set with the lace tablecloth, oatmeal cookies in the cookie tin, friends coming and going.
But there was a dark side to her marriage.
Today, tradwifers like Nara Smith and Hannah Neeleman have side gigs as social media influencers, which they use to pitch the lifestyle of the devoted homemaker and wife to their TikTok and Instagram followers — who often number in the millions.
Millions of followers means that tradwifers like Smith and Neeleman are raking in thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of dollars each year by monetizing their social media accounts.
Some influencers go so far as to sell stuff online — their own branded products. You can buy 24 grams of Neeleman’s Ballerina Farm Farmer Protein for $69.99. Plus shipping.
My mother had no such side gig, no independent source of income. She was totally dependent on my father for her support.
No Community Property Laws
And in those days in Michigan — it had no community property laws — if she were to divorce, she would have no claim on the money her husband earned as a corporate executive during their years together. She could get alimony payments, but only if a court so directed.
Many years later, after my father died, my mother talked about the dark side of her traditional life. At times, she said, she was so angry with my father she was ready to get in the car and drive away.
“But where would I go? To my mother’s? To my sister’s?” Neither of those women had the wherewithal — or the desire — to take my mother in for more than a night or two.
One lived in an apartment in Chicago with her third husband. The other — divorced and remarried — had six children of her own and was busy running the family resort, which she had inherited.
Life as a 1950s Tradwife
My mother had no marketable skills. She had finished high school, but not college. She had worked briefly as a secretary as a young woman, but hated the work and wasn’t particularly good at it.
My mother was stuck.
She was a tradwife.
In the long run, my parent’s marriage proved a good and lasting one. My mother had chosen well. Her traditional marriage — creating a home and deferring to her husband — had suited her.
She knew how to make that life work, and she took pains to show me how it was done. Over the dinner dishes, over the ironing board, she offered insider tips on how to tend the male ego:
“Your dad sings off key in church, but I don’t tell him. That would hurt his pride.”
“When you dance, let the boy take the lead. Dance on your toes. Be light as a feather, so you can follow his lead.” (Actually, this is great advice, which I hold dear. Dancing with a partner — especially when it’s your job to sense and follow the lead — is an art.)
And finally, a piece of advice I was never able to take: “You’re smart, Barbie. But don’t let the boys know it. Keep it to yourself.”
Postscript: I Found a Love Note
Hours after I thought I’d finished writing this piece, I came across a scrap of paper among my mother’s things. The scrap was so old and fragile it had torn down the middle, along a fold made decades ago. On the scrap of paper were four lines written first in my mother’s handwriting, then my father’s. It was a love poem, a poem too dear and private to share here.
That scrap of paper reminded me that I had left out the most important, most central, fact of my parents’ marriage: My mother loved my father. And my father loved her — probably from the moment he spotted her across that dance floor.

Enjoyed reading your short memoir and thinking about the one I am currently writing.!
Keep going!!!!!!
Loved this!!
Thanks, Kathy! — Barbara
You sifted through and kept or chose alternatives that worked for you and Jon.
Yep! — Barbara
Hi Barbara —
You know I’ve been an enthusiastic fan and writer friend since our March, 2012, Page to Stage performances at San Francisco Book Passage.
This time I want to push back on your line of thought that your mother was a “tradwife” stuck with no marketable skills. Given that she could read, write, speak, and had previously been a secretary, she had skills. And if she had examined her passions, hobbies and lived experience, she would have listed more skills that could be combined with the others to be an asset to make earnings. Women did that for centuries. When necessary to find earnings, one uses their imagination, energy and courage, and finds work that will provide those earnings.
You can be sure that if the scenario had occurred (here for example only) that your father had divorced your mother and provided no alimony, she would have put all sorts of energy and enterprise into successfully securing earnings.
I think it is dismissive to imagine 1950’s “tradwife” women without agency, talents, skills, imagination, strength, and courage.
Your fan and friend,
Sharon
Sharon,
Yes, my mother was a spirited, resourceful woman who would have made things work if she found herself a divorced mother of three. She often — successfully — took matters into her own hands on family issues that she felt strongly about.
Nonetheless, it was her perception of what her options were at the time — her words to me — that I want to emphasize in this piece.
Remember, this was the 1950s. Divorce law has changed since then. The culture has changed. Job opportunities have changed. The second wave feminist women’s movement has made it clear to women that they can have agency in their own lives.
My mother, like most women of her time, had a different mindset than the women of today have.
And so — what I am criticizing here is the romanticizing of the traditional mid-century housewife and mother — especially the current emphasis in some circles of making a virtue of being subservient to her husband.
btw, I’m all for women and men who choose to drop out of the workforce in order to be full-time homemakers for a time. That’s a great life. But not many families can afford it these days.
Thanks for bringing this up. Once again you have added some rigor to my thinking!
— Barbara