By Barbara Falconer Newhall
I give up. I’m not going to get on my soap box and plead for better gun safety laws any more. I’ve witnessed one too many slaughters of innocents. After Orlando, after Newtown, after San Bernardino I raged and fumed and called for stricter gun safety laws. And now, this week, 50-plus people have died needlessly in Las Vegas, and I’m done.
I’m buttoning my lip. I’m done pleading the gun safety case. I’m leaving it to gun owners and advocates to decide — is the unrestricted freedom to buy and own a gun worth the trade-off? Are American gun advocates willing to risk the inevitable two dozen plus mass shootings a month in their country in order to preserve the current broad interpretation of the Second Amendment? Is that what gun owners really want? I kinda doubt it.
I’m a left-leaning moderate who favors LGBTQ rights, protections for the environment, freedom of speech and freedom of the press, a woman’s right to choose — you get where I’m going with this. And I used to speak up for better gun safety laws.
I know of at least two kids in my town who died in gun accidents. They were playing with guns. Usually I’ve got plenty to say on the subject. But not this time. I’m giving up. I’m not getting on my soap box to argue for better gun control legislation this time.
Why? Because it’s not going to happen. Why won’t it happen? Because there are too many people — voters — who don’t want it to happen. Hunters, collectors, people concerned about self-defense: folks who feel their right to own ca gun would be threatened by any modifications in state and federal gun laws.
OK, then. I’m backing off. I’m leaving it up to gun owners and gun advocates to make the choice. I’m done.