The Writing Room: George Leonard and the Tao of Writing

George Leonard at Esalen. c 2009 Esalen Institute.

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

I’ve thought of George Leonard often over the years. And when I read in the New York Times last month that he had died on January 6 at the age of 86, I thought of him yet again.

George and I knew each other in New York at Look magazine , where we both worked during the 1960s.

That is to say, we were aware of each other at Look - I more aware of George than he of me.

I was a very young editorial secretary – and not a very good one. (My bosses were people like Betty Rollin, Jack Shepherd and Pat Carbine.) He was a Look writer and a star. He was documenting - no, inspiring - the youth and human potential movements that were fermenting in the San Francisco Bay Area at the time.

George went on to write a number of books, including Education and Ecstasy, The Way of Aikido, Mastery and The Ultimate Athlete. He was a long-time influence at the Esalen Institute. And he was as formidable physically as he was intellectually; he took up aikido at mid-life and earned a fifth-degree black belt.

Though he barely knew me, George was kind enough to meet with me when I first moved from New York to San Francisco in 1969. During that conversation, he gave me some advice I’ve kept pasted to the inside of my forehead ever since.

We were talking about story ideas, and I told him I had one I thought was pretty hot, but I didn’t want to reveal it to him. At Look, story ideas were gold, we treated them like state secrets. If we didn’t keep them under wraps, our competition – Life magazine – might get wind of them and scoop us. We hoarded our ideas.

George’s response took me by surprise. “Don’t worry about it,” he said. “Ideas are not in finite supply. The more you give away, the more you generate. That’s the way the universe works.”

Those aren’t George’s exact words. But they are the way I’ve remembered, interpreted and reinterpreted them over the years.

Following George’s advice has been a useful practice. I’ve learned over time that the more willing I am to help out other writers and share my ideas and (hard-won) expertise with them – the more thoughts, ideas, inspirations and writing tricks (hot ones all!) pop into my mind.

I think of it as the Tao of writing.

Thanks, George. I’m going to keep on thinking about you.

© 2010 Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition, GodsBigBlog, The Writing Room | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Case of the Human Condition: The Center of the Universe? It’s a Little Beach in Michigan, of Course

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

The Oakland Tribune, August 9, 1987

Up in Siskiyou mountain country, in the northwest corner of California, there is a spot known to the Karuk tribe as Kota-Mein.

In the Karuk language, Kota Mein means “center of the world.”

Like their ancestors before them, the Karuk people hike up to sacred spots like Kota-Mein, Chimney Rock and Doctor Rock to talk to the Great Spirit and to receive power.

I have never been to Kota-Mein, but I have been to Bass Lake, Mich.

If I were drawing a map of the world, its center would be at Bass Lake, just where its outlet flows into the great, blue Lake Michigan.

I have lived in California for nearly two decades, but like my forebears - my mother, her mother Toto, her mother Nana, and her mother, Grandma Harlow - I return to Bass Lake every chance I get.

I am drawn there as surely as a Michigan mosquito is drawn to the juicy ankles of anyone foolish enough to venture outdoors after dark in a Michigan summer.

Chimney Rock and Doctor Rock have been compared by their devotees to black holes in space, vortexes, whirlwinds of energy. Those spots on Earth have, it is said, the power to give the worthy pilgrim a vision of transcendence.

Last month, I left my husband behind in the Eastbay with a freezer full of spaghetti sauce and meatloaf.

The children and I boarded a Boeing 767 for a pilgrimage to Michigan. I wanted to show them my secret spots. Peter, 6, and Christina, 3, were enthusiastic.

They donned hats and mosquito netting to pick raspberries in the woods with their grandfather.

They watched the cherries being harvested. They caught a toad and inspected a patch of poison ivy.

Peter and Christina in the outlet aboard a classic inner tube.

Peter and Christina aboard a classic inner tube.

They learned to soothe their mosquito bites by wiping them with spit.

They met their great-aunt Ruth and made friends with a half-dozen second cousins, some of whom were drawn here, as we were, all the way from the West Coast.

They chased minnows in the warm, brown water of the Bass Lake outlet.

They took wet fistfuls of the creamy, miraculously clean Lake Michigan sand and let it drip off the ends of their fingers to make dainty drip castles.

They heard the story of the drip castle party their Uncle David and Aunt Alice once threw on the shores of the Pacific.

My brother and his wife, also a Midwesterner, once invited some California friends to a beach party, promising to initiate them in the intricacies of drip castle building.

They discovered, to their chagrin, that Northern California sand does not drip. The project was a flop.

Christina and Peter and their inner tube drift toward Lake Michigan.

Christina and Peter drift toward Lake Michigan.

When they grew sweaty, my children waded down the outlet into the Big Lake. They threw their bellies onto the breaking waves and dove for the smooth rocks buried in the sand.

Again and again, they climbed aboard a much-patched inner tube and drifted down the outlet into the Big Lake.

The hours passed.

My mother sat on a beach towel spread on the sand, watching her daughter and grandchildren. “This is life,” she sighed.

Behind her, Lake Michigan’s waves crashed noisily on the beach, just as they had crashed when I was a girl and when she was a girl and when our great-grandmothers were girls.

When I was a seventh-grader, I painted a picture of this beach in art class. Sand, grass and lake blended together in a misty - and I thought - very successful portrait of my beach.

My art teacher was displeased. “It doesn’t look real,” she said. “Too sweet.”

Before we left, I showed Peter and Christina one last secret spot - the view of the Big Lake and outlet from a high sand bluff to the north.

From this bluff, there is nothing to see but beauty. Even the human bathers, many of them grown fat on too much cherry pie and sweet corn, take on a certain grace when seen from up here.

Photos c 1987 B.F. Newhall

Photos c 1987 B.F. Newhall

I had my Nikkormat along and, as always, I took a picture of the outlet.

The Siskiyou Indians forbid photographs of their “power sites.” When my pictures returned, I saw that, sure enough, it had happened again.

My magical spot was gone. What I held in my hands was a 3 ½ by 5-inch glossy of - just another beautiful beach.

I’ll have to go back and try it again.

© 1987  The Oakland Tribune

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition, GodsBigBlog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

God’s Big Blog: I’m Convinced — Doubt Is Good

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

No doubt about it. After opening up the short, sweet and succint In Praise of Doubt by sociologists Peter Berger and Anton Zijderveld, I’m feeling really good about my doubter status.

in-praise-of-doubt-berger-zijderveldDoubt is what makes the difference between a person of faith and a fanatic, the authors assert. Faith is different from knowledge, as in, ”I know that I’m in Boston; I believe that my life is in God’s hands.”

This is a fascinating book that touches on everything from the Enlightenment, Calvinism and the scientific method to Marxism, modernity,  fundamentalism, and the trend toward the secularization of everything.

The two authors make some useful, thoughtful distinctions along the way — for example between the words plurality and pluralism. Plurality describes a situation in which diverse groups live together and interact together, the authors note. Pluralism connotes a value judgement; it welcomes the reality of plurality.

Two very interesting minds are at work in this book. Enjoy!

In Praise of Doubt: How to Have Convictions Without Becoming a Fanatic, by Peter Berger and Anton Zijderveld, HarperOne, hardcover, 179 pages, $23.99, 2009.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in Book Openers, GodsBigBlog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Book Openers: A Progressive Protestant Reclaims Christianity

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

I know way too many people whose impression of Christianity has been shaped either by media accounts of the (noisy) Religious Right or by books written the (equally noisy) New Atheists.

As the saying goes, where religion in America is concerned, the loudest noise is coming from the shallow end of the swimming pool.

So many of my otherwise well-informed friends seem to be  unaware of the vibrant progressive movement that is alive and well today in America’s Protestant churches.

Open James A. Forbes Jr.’s new book, Whose Gospel? for a brisk tour of the progressive Christian take on sexuality, gender, race, justice and war.

Whose Gospel? A Concise Guide to Progressive Protestantism, by James A. Forbes Jr., with a forward by Bill Moyers, The New Press, 2010, 176 pages, $23.95.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in Book Openers, GodsBigBlog | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Case of the Human Condition: When Your Six-Year-Old Wants to Talk Money

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

The Oakland Tribune, November 15, 1987

Peter likes money.

He wants an allowance.

The subject came up at the breakfast table.

Jon and I debated. Fifty cents a week? 75 cents?

Peter: Halloween cowboy  c 1987 B.F. Newhall

Peter: Halloween cowboy c 1987 B.F. Newhall

“Let’s not talk in cents,” said Peter, who is 6 1/2, pushing 7. “Let’s talk in dollars.”

He wanted $2.

Nonplussed, I changed the subject.

Spending his allowance on candy would not be allowed, I said. “No candy, no weapons, no caps for the cap pistol.”

Jon demurred. “It’s Peter’s money.”

“It’s my money,” said Peter.

Not yet it wasn’t.

We were stalemated. The subject was dropped.

Peter likes money because he likes things. Money can buy him things.

He comes by the tendency honestly.

His paternal grandfather likes things. Victorian Furniture. ‘57 Chryslers. Coins.

Peter likes Battle Beast vehicles. Walkie talkies. Rainbow, his stuffed puppy. He-Man swords. Cowboy pistols. Space stations. His blankie.

His things help him to think.

If he is feeling cuddly, he wraps the blankie around Rainbow. Lonesome, he calls Mommy on the Walkie Talkie. Powerful - or powerless - he pits a Battle Beast against the enemy and defeats him soundly.

Peter is loyal to his things.

Every stuffed giraffe, battered firefighter’s hat, nursery school glue project and legless Superman holds an eternal and immutable place in Peter’s heart.

But that does not mean there is no space in Peter’s heart or in Peter’s bedroom for something new.

At the toy store, he spotted a Battle Beast vehicle he had never seen.

“Mommy, can I have it?”

“It’s expensive. It’s $12.83.”

“I want it.”

“Well, you could earn it. You could learn your math facts. I’ll give you a dime for each time you practice a set.”

“You will? Rad!”

“$12.83 is a lot of money. It will take a lot of work.”

Peter fondled the shiny package.

“Mommy, I want to work,” he said firmly.

It cost me $12.83 and 4 ½ hours of my own time, but three days later, Peter knew his addition facts, right down to six plus seven and eight plus nine.

“Three plus four. Three plus four,” said Peter, slapping his forehead. “I’ve got to think faster. Oh, yeh. Seven!”

Another dime clinked into Peter’s stash.

“Wait, mommy, let’s count how much dollars I have.”

Again and again, Peter counted his money.

He learned he could make a dollar with 10 dimes or four quarters. He counted his coins by twos, by fives, by 10s.

I was stunned. I did not know that Peter could learn so much so fast. I didn’t know that he was so intensely interested in money.

Most of all, I was surprised that I could pander so unconscionably to my son’s greed.

When Peter was a toddler and still soiling his pants, I tried everything.

I let him go barebottomed. I followed him around with the potty. I praised. I scolded. I tried patience. I tried exasperation. Nothing worked.

Finally, I tried M&M’s - one for Peter, one for Christina - for every successful trip to the potty.

It worked.

It worked, not because Peter is a profane, banal kid who responds only to bribes. It worked because I gave Peter a choice. He could use the potty and get an M&M. Or he could use his underpants and not get an M&M.

For the first time in his life Peter - not Mom - was in charge of his bathroom functions.

Stephanie’s mother uses raisins and Cheerios.

To get Stephanie to practice her reading last year, she put a raisin or a Cheerio on each word in the word list. Stephanie read and ate, read and ate, read and ate.

“They need a reward,” explains my sister-in-law, Alice, a school counselor and my mentor in these things.

“I wouldn’t work if I didn’t get paid for it. Why should they?”

At least one other mother in our neighborhood has come to understand the value of money.

“I’m going to sell my candy to my mother,” Sterling informed Peter on Halloween night. “Then I’m going to buy a toy.”

“That’s right,” said Claudia, as she served up a Halloween supper of low-cal turkey lasagna. “Then I’m going to throw it all away.”

Two nights later, Jon and Peter saw Sterling and his mother at Safeway.

Sterling was still in possession of his candy.

“I want $30 for it,” said Sterling.

“And I won’t pay more than $5,” said Claudia.

 © 1987 The Oakland Tribune

Peter is 28 years old now. He’s paid off his student loans and his car payments, he doesn’t mind taking the red eye, and if there’s a 401k in the picture he’s maxed it out.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

A Case of the Human Condition: Would My Husband Like to Add My Name to His?

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

January 8, 1989, The Oakland Tribune

Jon and I had been married nearly 12 years. It was time to pop the question again.

I called him at work. Sometimes, the best way to get Jon’s attention is to phone.

“What do you think?’ I said, going straight to the point. “Are you ready to add Falconer to your name yet?”

“No,” he laughed.

“Why not? We have Peter Falconer Newhall, Christina Falconer Newhall and Barbara Falconer Newhall. What this family needs is a Jon Falconer Newhall.”

No soap.

When Jon and I married, I wanted to share a name with him and our future children. It would give our family an identity, and it would make things less confusing for friends, family and insurance companies.

Christina Falconer Newhall, Peter Falconer Newhall, Barbara Falconer Newhall, Jon Newhall  c 2007 B.F. Newhall

Christina Falconer Newhall, Peter Falconer Newhall, Barbara Falconer Newhall, Jon Newhall c 2007 B.F. Newhall

Sure enough, years later, I sat listening as Christina’s kinderarten teacher explained to incoming parents that each family had its own box for messages.

“To minimize confusion,” she said, “the boxes are alphabetized under the mother’s name.”

Thus, Nicholas Strychacz and his father Thomas now look for their messages in the cubby labeled Kathryn Reiss. Eric Hasler and his dad Robert, look for theirs under Linda Hoffman. The Newhalls simply look for theirs in the box labeled Newhall.

The question, back in 1977 and now in 1989, was not whether Jon would change his name to mine. He would not. He will not.

Jon washes lettuce and barbecues chicken. He sees to it that there is always an avocado ripening on the stove and something interesting to take to the potluck. But changing his name to mine would put Jon’s feminist convictions into overload. If we are to be a one-name family, the name has to be Newhall.

During my most insistently feminist days, circa 1969, Bay Area feminists like Una Stannard and her husband (I forget his name) warned against the practice of changing names.

Una’s position and that of other feminists has remained steadfast. In her new book, “Naming Ourselves, Naming Our Children,” Sharon Lebell writes that taking a man’s name represents for women “a major identity rupture.”

Women pliant enough to suffer their names to be changed upon marriage risk becoming “so potentially protean that it’s hard to pinpoint the part of you that abides, the part of you that defines you,” writes Lebell.

But, at age 35, with more than a decade of single adulthood behind me, I did not worry about being too compliant. I perceived myself as tough. I could earn a living, fix a faucet and pick up a diner tab with the best of them.

“Cooperate,” urged my 97-year-old grandmother upon learning that I had passed my 30th birthday still single.

My grandmother was Mrs. David Falconer until she died. Decades after his death, my grandfather’s name was still listed in the Scotville, Mich., phone book — by the woman who bore his name.

She may have been old-fashioned about her name, but my grandmother had a mind of her own. No one ever confused her with my grandfather. And she was right on about cooperation. Giving in once in a while — collaborating — would do me good.

And so began a series of compromises that has left me wondering, 12 years later, whether I have sold out.

Am I leading the life I once dreaded? Am I wallowing in domesticity?

Shouldn’t I be out there on the barricades, dressed for success, carrying a Vuitton briefcase? Shouldn’t I be on a board of directors somewhere, wielding power like mad?’

Why don’t I have a full-time nanny and a self-cleaning oven? Why am I making do with three denim skirts and a canvas KQED tote bag left over from the year we donated big?

It’s true. I worry about all the wrong things. Why my daughter doesn’t like dolls. Whether my son is any good at first base. Whether I’m putting on too much weight. Whether my husband thinks I’m putting on too much weight.

But I am still a feminist. I am not one of those New Traditionalists touted by the media. I’m on the barricades right here in my house on the hill — just as much as if I were being groomed for CEO or pressing for pay equity.

I’m someone who chose to have children and work part-time for a few years, someone who chose the life-long company of a certain man, even it it meant football every Sunday afternoon in December.

I am Barbara Falconer, with the Newhall tacked on, and I’m satisfied with that.

As for Jon’s name, I think I’ll phone him again at the turn of the century.

© 1989  The Oakland Tribune

I just hollered upstairs at Jon to ask — once again — did he want to take Falconer as his middle name? “No thanks,” he said. ”I’ve never had a middle name, everyone else does, and I like being different . . . It’s nothing personal, believe me. ” I do.

My solution worked for one generation, but how about Peter and Christina? Whose name will they keep — Mom’s or Dad’s? How are the latest generation of women (and men) solving the problem in your family?

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

GodsBigBlog: OK, What’s God’s Big Blog?

Mt. Tamalpais in July. c 2009 B.F. Newhall

I go where it takes me . . . Mt. Tamalpais in July. c 2009 B.F. Newhall

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

A reader named Dana asks, “What is GodsBigBlog?”

Good question.

GodsBigBlog is — God’s Big Blog.

I’m a religion writer in the tradition of Huston Smith and the universalists. I’ve interviewed and observed hundreds of people with dozens of different, often conflicting, ideas, spiritual paths and experiences of Holy, and I have come to the conclusion that the Sacred, whatever It is, must be very large. If God is to encompass all those earnest people and all their - to me convincing - experiences of Holy, God must be very big, indeed.

Also, it seems to me that Whatever Is Going On Out/In There is way beyond human understanding, which takes me back to — God Is Big.

When I launched my blog, someone else was using the URL God Is Big, so I had to come up with an alternative. I named this part of my blog GodsBigBlog, which is URL-speak for God Is Big - or God’s Big.

There’s a pun there, and I like it. God’s Big Blog can also mean this is God’s Big Blog.

God’s blog, not mine. I just live here and go where it takes me.

So there you have it.

© 2009  Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition, GodsBigBlog | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

A Case of the Human Condition: Mad Men Exposes the ’60s Girdle — But How Will She Get It Off in Time?

I loved the strip tease on last Sunday’s Mad Men season premiere. The fitted suit. The cloche hat. The pumps. So 1963.

For those of you who missed the show: A blond stewardess drops her mid-century modest garments to the floor, one by one, until there is nothing left between her, the show’s hero, and their one-night stand – except a girdle.

I want to know — how was she planning to get that thing off?

You don’t think it’s a problem? Then you’ve never experienced a genuine 1963 girdle.

When my daughter was eight years old, I took her aside one day and explained the girdle facts of life to her. Read all about it below:

Don Draper smokes and ponders his existential angst in the Mad Men TV shoow logo.

Mad Man Don Draper smokes and ponders his existential angst.

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

The Oakland Tribune, October 13, 1991 

“What’s a girdle?” Peter wanted to know.

“It’s something you . . . a woman wears to make herself thin,” I told him.

“Why not just get a Tummyciser?” said Peter, rolling his belly muscles.

You could.  You could get the Tummyciser.  You could do the aerobic walking.  You could eat the cottage cheese instead of wearing it on your thighs.  Or, you could spend $26 for a navel-to-knee body shaper - and be thin now.

As I see it, the world our children are inheriting fairly oozes with ways to feel better fast - fast food, fast cars, fast sex.

But this season, there is another quick fix on the scene.  Something I thought the women’s movement had banished from the intelligent woman’s underwear drawer decades ago - the girdle.

There it was, a week ago Friday, a department store ad touting the sexiness of shapewear.  Shapewear!  You can’t fool me.  I remember the ’50s.  I know a girdle when I see one.

I dropped Peter off at a friend’s house and took Christina with me to the mall.  Just us girls.  There, we located the Bali tailored brief, the Flexees Subtract and the Vanity Fair Slender Slip, as advertised.

“Do you know what a girdle is?” I asked my daughter as I hung the garments up in our fitting room.  Christina, who was eight years old at the time, wasn’t sure.  Embarrassed, she pointed at my derriere.

Good.  There was still time to warn my daughter off the girdle, in all its anti-woman, anti-health, anti-common sense ridiculousness.  I held up the Bali brief and declared, “No, Christina.  This is a girdle.”

It was an extra large.  I had grabbed the largest Bali on the rack so I could get it on without too many gyrations.  My goal was to make the girdle appear ridiculous in the eyes of my eight-year-old, not myself.

“I’m not going to buy one of these,” I said, pulling on the Bali.  “I’m just going to teach you some history, some girdle history.”

“I already know enough history.”

“If you don’t know history, you are doomed to repeat it,” I retorted, grunting a little with the familiar effort of pulling spandex across flesh.

There is nothing fatter than a woman in the act of putting on a girdle.  A girdle has a way of collecting up flesh as it is pulled upward, pushing it in a trembling mass toward the waist.

The experienced girdle-wearer knows this.  Patiently, she works the garment toward her waist and then, with a yank and a wiggle, she snaps the last bit of girdle over the last bit of fat.  Her body has been tamed.  Spandex rules.

The Bali in place, I glanced at Christina.  “How do I look?”

“It makes you look worse,” she said.  “It’s squashed all the fat onto your legs.  Your legs look way too fat.”

I turned to one side and looked in the mirror, hoping she was wrong.  She wasn’t. “Girdles do that,” was all I could say. “Let’s try the Slender Slip.”

The Slender Slip was a tour de force of modern technology.  It was shaped like a pencil-thin slip, but was made of stretchy, leg-hugging material.  A panel through the crotch and some rubbery stuff inside the lace at the bottom kept it from riding up.

I watched myself in the mirror as I pulled it on.  I realized that there is something fatter than a woman pulling on a girdle.  It is a woman wearing a Slender Slip.  The Slender Slip curves cruelly under the derriere and around the potbelly.  It highlights every lump and curve.  It is merciless.

I took it off before Christina could comment and I reached for the Flexees Subtract.  Designed to slenderize from waistline to shin bones, this was easily the largest expanse of spandex I had ever seen.  I had never worn such an ambitious girdle.

“This is the ne plus ultra of foundation garments,” I said, slipping some French into the history lesson.  Carefully, I gathered up the right leg and slipped my foot through.  “You have to pull these on a little at a time.”

I lectured and pulled and lectured and pulled, hoping Christina was noticing what a pain in the derriere a girdle can be.

A pain in the derriere and a pain in the belly.  My girdle memories were coming back to me now.  Some I shared with Christina. Others I saved for a later date.

If a woman wears a tight girdle for more than an hour or two, for example, she is likely to experience stomach cramps, especially if there is a meal involved.

Or, if she sits in her girdle for very long, she can get girdle burn.  The girdle stretches as she sits, causing the tiny holes in the spandex to open up and capture tiny pieces of her skin.  When she stand, the spandex holes close up and pinch her unsuspecting flesh.

And, too, there is the chastity-belt effect.  A girdle is not easy to put on.  The prudent woman thinks twice before taking one off.

At last, the navel-to-knee girdle was in place and I looked - terrific.  My lower half was at least two sizes smaller.

“It looks good on the bottom,” said Christina, “but you look weird on top, like raw chicken meat.  I like it better when you be yourself.”

End of history lesson.

©1991 The Oakland Tribune

Back to Don Draper, the hotel room, and his frantic-for-sex stewardess: Now you know why the script required the fire alarm to go off when it did. The Mad Men writers had no idea how to get that girdle off that stewardess without turning hot sex into farce.

Hint: If she knew she was going to do a strip tease, the stewardess would have excused herself to the bathroom, removed the girdle, stuffed it into her purse, and returned to her paramour — fully dressed but girdleless.

© 2009 Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Case of the Human Condition: The More Things Change . . . The More They Stay the Same — Only Different

The entrance to the school hasn't changed.

The entrance to the school hasn't changed.

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

Birmingham, Michigan, my old home town, is deep in flyover country. I live in California now and, Left Coast chauvinist that I am, I tend to assume that Birmingham is still in the boonies - and the Fifties.

But I am tending wrong. I took a tour of my old school last month along with a few dozen others from the class of ‘59. We learned that Birmingham High School (now known as Seaholm H.S.)  is thoroughly politically correct, digitized – and race-, gender- and handicapped-sensitive. It’s an honest-to-gosh twenty-first century kind of place. To wit:

 

The media center -- darkened for computer monitors.

The media center -- darkened for computer monitors.

The library is no more. But there’s a media center.

The choir room goes by the loftier “vocal music room.”

The boys’ lavatory is now the men’s restroom, the girls’ bathroom, the women’s.

Both are wheelchair accessible.

The old shops, where the boys were required by state law back in the Fifties to take a couple semesters of wood, metal or auto shop, are gone. That wing of the school is now the Engineering Lab. They build robots in there.

Michigan boys had to take shop in the Fifties, and Michigan girls had to take home economics - cooking, sewing or child care. But home ec has gone the way of the treadle sewing machine, and this part of the school is now home to a huge kitchen where boys and girls - er, men and women - are required to take a semester of something called Food and Nutrition.

The boys' lavatory is now a restroom for "men."

The boys' lavatory is now a restroom for "men."

We had no girls’ swim team at all back in the Fifties. There was no budget for it. But we did have Aquabelles, a synchronized swim club that met week nights after dinner. (The boys’ team had the pool every afternoon.)

Fifty years later, synchronized swimming has gone the way of the one-piece bathing suit. The girls’ swim team now outnumbers the boys’ three to one. A huge, many-laned pool has been built and the old pool room is now a weight room. On the Saturday my classmates and I visited the school, the girls’ swim team was in the weight room, working on their abs and gluts.

If you were hungry after school back in 1957, you had one choice: an apple you bought for a dime from the apple vending machine that stood outside the cafeteria.

Now instead of an apple machine, three brightly lit - power sucking - machines  dispense drinks and snacks. Two of them flash neon ads for Pepsi.

As for lunch in the cafeteria — we had choices - macaroni and cheese for thirty cents. Or a hamburger for another twenty cents. That’s it. Or bring your own.

Three power guzzlers have replaced the modest apple vending machine.

Three power guzzlers have replaced the modest apple vending machine. Photos c 2009 B.F. Newhall

On the days a sandwich was the thirty-cent offering, we had a choice - the sandwich with a slice of white bread facing up, or the one next to it with a slice of wheat bread facing up. Every sandwich had one slice of each, so you were sure to get what you wanted. Kinda.

Nowadays, the kids in this affluent suburb of Detroit have some dazzling choices. Instead of the plump local cooks and dieticians that I remember — they wore hairnets and white dresses – the cafeteria is powered today by the international institutional feeder Sodexo. A pizza station and a salad bar were just two of the options I spotted.

I’m trying hard to remember the racial make-up of my school back in the Fifties. I think we had one black boy in my class. He palled around with a girl who was one of the few Jews in our school. The Jewish families all lived in the same neighborhood, as I recall. The real estate agents saw to that.

Now, only 94 percent of the students in the Birmingham school district are white. Three percent are African American. The rest are Asian, Hispanic and Native American.

Let’s see, check my math: Does that mean that today, in a high school class the size of mine - 500 kids - instead of just one African American, there would be fifteen?

Coming soon: More pictures!

c 2009 Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Books Openers: Harvey Cox — You Don’t Have to Believe to Be a Christian

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

I’d like to recommend Harvey Cox’s newest book to all my non-believer friends.

Members of the Religion Newswriters Association were treated to a visit from Harvey Cox at their September conference in Minneapolis. Photo c 2009 B.F. Newhall

Members of the Religion Newswriters Association were treated to a visit from Harvey Cox at their September conference in Minneapolis. Photo c 2009 B.F. Newhall

So many of the sophisticated, highly educated people I know labor under the assumption that they have to believe - to assent intellectually to - the factuality of traditional Christian teaching.

 

It seems that the one thing they have retained from whatever Sunday schooling they had as children is that they must believe every word of the Apostles’ Creed or Nicene Creed.

 

They don’t. That’s my opinion. And here’s why: The idea of a fixed creed to which a true Christian must subscribe dates back, not to the life of Jesus, but to the fourth century, when the emperor Constantine converted to Christianity and took control of the church.

 

Constantine saw great possibilities in the popular new religion that was spreading like wildfire across his empire. But beliefs about the nature of Jesus Christ were diverse and often contradictory in that early church. A common religion with a common creed, Constantine reasoned, would help him to unify — and control – the many and varied peoples of the Roman Empire. With that in mind, he insisted that church leaders come together and settle on a single set of beliefs.

 

The bishops complied, and in the centuries that followed - right up into the twentieth century - Christians were taught that, to be a true Christian, one had to believe.

So powerful was the Christian belief in belief, that in some eras, heresy - incorrect belief - could get you burned at the stake.

But now, according to Harvard professor and theologian Cox, the age-old Christian belief in belief is becoming a thing of the past: the Age of Belief is over.

Harvey Cox’s ground-breaking The Secular City was a best-seller in 1965. It sold more than 1 million copies. Now, with his newest book, The Future of Faith, the Harvard theologian presents fresh food for thought: that Christianity is entering a new era. He calls it the Age of the Spirit.

Cox identifies three ages in Christian history:

The Age of Faith. In the first three centuries of Christian history, Cox argues, the early church was not concerned about creed, doctrine, belief or hierarchy. Theological ideas about the nature of God were not as important as following the teachings of Jesus.

The Age of Belief. In the fourth century, Constantine asserted control over the Christian church and insisted that everyone in the empire subscribe to a common creed. As a result, until well into the twentieth century, the church focused on correct belief, on doctrine and orthodoxy. For centuries, Westerners assumed that belief - accepting traditional Christian doctrine - was essential to faith.

The Age of the Spirit. Since the mid-twentieth century, more and more Christians have been ignoring dogma and creed and turning toward a more spiritual Christianity - while finding commonalities with other wisdom traditions. Faith and belief are two different things, Cox argues. Beliefs are opinions, while faith - fidelity - is a way of life, a placing of one’s confidence in Spirit.

harvey-cox-future-of-faith-harperoneUntil recently, Cox was the Hollis Professor of Divinity at Harvard, where he has been teaching since 1965. He retired in September, but he is staying on at Harvard as research professor and is turning his attention to religion and science, and Christian-Muslim relations.

As for my non-believer friends — I hope they’ll open Cox’s book and free themselves of the burden of belief.

The Future of Faith, by Harvey Cox, HarperOne, 245 pages hardcover, $24.99.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in Book Openers, GodsBigBlog | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Writing Room: Feng Shui for the Work Room — and the Bedroom

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

Thumbing through a book on feng shui at the now defunct Gaia bookstore in Berkeley a few years ago, I ran across a chapter on decorating the bedroom. The author wanted her readers to know that bringing pictures of family and friends into a bedroom is a sure way to wreck its romantic feng shui.

Who, after all, wants to have sex with mothers, mothers-in-law, small children - or even one’s college roommates - watching from all over the walls and dresser tops? For that matter, who can sleep with crowds of people rattling around the room, posing, smiling, hugging, and crying out for attention?

My mother's desk -- tucked away between a recliner and the fax machine.

My mother's desk -- tucked away between a recliner and the fax machine.

I’ve decided that this feng shui principle for bedrooms applies nicely to my writing room. There are no big photos in my study. No kids, no parents, no family, no one I know.

Pictures of my children send me into worry mode. If a photo of Christina as a 12-year-old catches my eye, four-figure orthodontia bills spring to mind. If it’s a picture of Peter as a 2-year-old, I see the red bite marks he once left on a babysitter’s arm.

Pictures of my parents are even worse. “When are you going to get a real job, Barb?” they shout from their frames as I enter the workroom. Peering over my shoulder as I write, they pass judgment on me and my thoughts, “You’re writing about that? Shame on you.”

Which brings me to a decision I faced earlier this week - where to put my mother’s old, carved desk with its matching chair? It was a wedding gift from a rich aunt. And, like my mother, that desk with its graceful curves and sworls has never left me.

When I was a girl, it stood in the living room window at the front of our  red brick colonial house in a new, post-war Detroit neighborhood. Ditto in our more ample cape cod house in the suburb, also new, where I spent my teens. Space was short in my parents’ tiny retirement ranch house on the outskirts of Phoenix, however, and the desk was left forgotten in the guest room.

A few years ago, when my mother got ready to move from Phoenix to an assisted living apartment here in the Bay Area, I rescued the old thing from the Goodwill giveaways and had it delivered to my house.

Photos c 2009 B.F. Newhall

Photos c 2009 B.F. Newhall

It’s a beautiful desk. A curved top, delicate swooping legs, solid wood drawers. It was probably expensive. My mother tells me that the rich aunt had had a few drinks over lunch with my grandmother before the two of them set off to shop for my mother’s wedding present in downtown Chicago.

Beautiful as it is, that desk is so saturated with memories of my mother and my childhood that being in the same room with it is like being in the same room with my mother. Sometimes, it’s just a lovely, graceful desk, complete unto itself. At other times, I am cooped up indoors beside it on a dark winter’s day in Detroit with no place to go, nothing to do, nothing to read, nobody and nothing to play with, no thoughts to call my own.

Jon and I have tried putting the desk in different rooms around our house here in California. It looked very pretty in our living room - in its rightful place at the front window. But its petite lines were overwhelmed by the other furniture in the room, especially the heavy Victorian tables from Jon’s side of the family. Finally, we moved the desk into the den, where it’s now tucked away - wasted really - in a dark corner, anachronized by our big screen TV, the fax machine, and our sprawling black leather recliners.

Some people would insist that the logical place for this lovely example of prewar workmanship is a corner of my writing room. There’s plenty of space down here. The colors and the proportions of the desk are right. And a writing desk for a writer’s room - what could be more fitting?

But those would be people who don’t understand a writer’s work and how much it has in common with sex. Which is - you can’t do it with your mother in the room.

© 2009 Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition, The Writing Room | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A — Contagious — Case of the Human Condition: Me vs. the Mighty Microbe

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

The Oakland Tribune, May 31, 1989

I believe in microbes. Microbes are like God. You can’t hear them, taste them, smell them or see them with the naked eye.

But you know they’re there. Closer to you than your jugular vein.

Lately, I’ve had more experiences with microbes than with God, so I’m a little more certain of their existence.

Microbes, we have learned first-hand at our house, can cause earaches, headaches, sinus aches, muscle aches, stomachaches, toothaches and temper tantrums.

Microbes can transform a perfectly reasonable person into a madwoman unfit for human society. She bellows at her children. She bellows at her husband.

At work, she groans at the stack of unanswered phone messages. At home, she blows her top at the plastic spoon melted onto the dishwasher heating element.

Nothing wrong with that.

Child care: Fingers, mouths, noses, shoes -- any microbes here? Ya think? c 1989 B.F. Newhall

Child care: Fingers, mouths, noses, the soles of shoes -- any microbes here? Ya think? C 2009 B.F. Newhall

Unless, of course, everyone else in the house is also sick. Instead of shrugging off the madwoman’s pyrotechnics and gently leading her to bed - they bellow back.

What happens next verges on child abuse. Or spousal abuse, depending mostly upon proximity.

Which is why, one day earlier this spring, I found myself pressing an elevator button with my elbow rather than my forefinger.

It was a ridiculous thing to do, of course. An uptight, paranoid thing to do. But I was on my way to lunch. I planned to use my fingers to eat my bacon and avocado on rye.

Surely there was at least one pneumococcus bacterium lurking on that elevator button, at least one flu virus waiting to make its home in my upper respiratory tract. A Type B Victoria most likely.

Some folks, I notice, are fearless. They press elevator buttons. They trade bites at Paloma. They kiss.

They kiss friends, neighbors, near-strangers. They kiss in broad daylight and on the mouth. They seem unaware that, according to Alameda County health statistics, 89 different rhinovirus types and one subtype are on the loose in the Eastbay.

I kiss my children. Sometimes I kiss my husband. But, outside of that, I don’t do much kissing anymore.

If I shake hands, I long to do like the pediatrician swabbing for strep - wash my hands before and after.

In my youth - which, looking back, I see ended the day baby Peter arrived in our house - I didn’t worry much about microbes.

I gulped vitamin C daily and got my heart rate up to 120 beats per minute three times a week and let it go at that.

Elevator buttons didn’t worry me. I pressed them with impunity. Door knobs and telephone receivers were simply door knobs and telephone receivers. They were not habitats of the adenovirus.

If an old friend wanted to kiss, I kissed. What the heck.

In those days before kids, I was not often sick. When I was, I went directly to bed like a sensible person and stayed there until I was well. But things are different for the working mother of small children. If she sleeps at all, it is during the night. Days and evenings she is on duty.

As for the children of working mothers, they go to child care. When they are sick, Mom thinks twice before staying home with them. She does not want to be Mommy Tracked.

So, every once in a while, she finds herself sending the sore throat and the green runnies off to day care. She hopes the provider thinks it’s allergies.

There, her children trade baseball cards and microbes with the children of other working mothers.

Zachary gets the Mark McGwire and the respiratory syncytial virus. Caleb gets Candy Maldonado and the klebsiella bacterium.

Zach’s mother, as a result, assumes that at any given moment, summer or winter, she is incubating something grisly. Parainfluenza, staph, strep.

And so, when one of the legion of fearless folks who like to kiss puts out a hand and offers a gentlemanly kiss, it is not simply her own health that concerns her.

She grasps the proferred hand and deftly turns her head. The kiss lands safely on her cheek, not her lips. She holds her breath.

Now, if her courtly friend will just remember to wash his hands before dinner, he’ll never know how close he came.

© 1989 The Oakland Tribune

I still elbow elevator buttons, especially when I’m visiting my mother’s assisted living apartment building.  And I’m really keen on those alcohol wipe dispensers I see everywhere these days — at the entrance to the supermarket and the gym.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A (Pillow) Case of the Human Condition: Time to Crack Open That Hope Chest and Live a Little

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

I waited too long to get married. By the time Jon and I said our vows, the contents of my hope chest had become outdated, old-fashioned, fussy — unusable.

As a result, after thirty some years of marriage, I continue to be the owner of a dozen or so beautiful, hand-embroidered, virginal pillowcases. I’ve had them in my possession all these years. And I’ve never used them.

My grandmother in Scottville, Michigan, made them for me when I was a girl. She sent me a pair every Christmas for years, and each time she did, I wrote a nice thank-you note and stored the pretty things away.

pillowcase-grandma-falconer-scottville-michiganThey would be my trousseau, I decided. I’d save them up until I was married and my Real Life could begin. When that time came, I’d share my pretty pillow cases with my husband and our most special house guests. Bed sheets were always white in those days, and the pillowcases with their delicate embroidered edges would bring color to my marriage bed and to our guest room.

Unfortunately, by the time 1977 rolled around and Jon and I finally began our life together, white bed sheets had gone the way of big Sunday dinners right after church and nylon stockings with seams up the back. All the department stores at the time were showing bright, boldly colored sheets with big blocky prints.

Crisp white sheets? A thing of the past. Dainty, flowered pillowcases? Fussy and sentimental. My trousseau pillowcases with their daisy chains and sprigs of orange blossom? An embarrassment. The very idea of a trousseau - still more embarrassment. I hid the pillowcases away and bought a set of Marimekko sheets at Macy’s.

The years went by. Jon and I moved from a double bed, to a queen sized bed, to a king. Sheets were purchased, used till threadbare, then ripped up and stuffed in the rag bag. Children were born. They slept in cribs. They slept in bunk beds. They slept in sleeping bags. They went off to college and slept on extra-long sheets in extra-long dorm beds.

pillowcase-hand-embroideredBut every Christmas when it came time to dig through the linen closet for the Christmas stockings, I’d come across Grandma Falconer’s hand-made pillow cases and feel sad. Chain stitch, satin stitch, cross stitch, French knot — her handiwork was so careful, so loving, so Midwestern, so out of synch with my West Coast life style.

But styles changed. Eventually, I lost interest in the big, bold patterns of my newlywed years. I took to buying plain blue and green sheets with interchangeable blue and green pillowcases. It was simpler to make the beds up that way. The trouble was, at our house pillowcases were like socks - a pair goes into the wash and only one comes out, its mate gone missing.

Meanwhile, the faithful pillow cases continued to turn up every Christmas. Pretty, I’d think when I spotted them in their linen wrapping under the Christmas stockings. Old-fashioned, but pretty. And really, they are treasures. Heirlooms practically. And too good to use every day. I’ll just put them back on their shelf in the linen closet and save them for a really special occasion.

More years go by. Lots of them. Until, finally last week, getting ready for houseguests - Peter and his girlfriend from Minnesota - once again I was short a pillowcase or two. And there they were in the linen closet buried under the Christmas stockings as always: Grandma’s lovely old hand-embroidered pillowcases with their trilliums and marguerites and vines of ivy.

I found this Christmas card tucked among my grandmother's pillowcases. Her handwriting was as meticulous as her needlework. Photos C B.F. Newhall

I found this Christmas card tucked among my grandmother's pillowcases. Her handwriting was as meticulous as her needlework. Photos C B.F. Newhall

I pulled them out, chose the prettiest two pairs in the lot and dropped them into the washing machine. Grandma’s pillowcases had been waiting forty years for my Real Life to begin. They’d want to freshen up a bit.

© 2010 Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Case of the Human Condition: Geographic Mobility in America — Watching My Kids Disappear

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

Most of my grandmother’s children - there were seven of them - lived out their lives within walking distance of their mother’s white frame house in Scottville, Michigan.

Not my father. He moved away.

Which is why, when I think of my Grandma Falconer I see the pince-nez, the soft pink skin and the silvery-white hair swept into an up-do — but I also see my grandmother’s figure standing motionless at the foot of her driveway, watching as my family drives out of town.

My grandmother as I remember her, her hair in a silvery up-do, her pince-nez in place.

My grandmother as I remember her, her hair in a silvery up-do, her pince-nez in place.

My grandmother waves at first, then she just stands there for long moments, gazing after us as our Ford two-door disappears down State Street and out of sight.

My grandmother lived ninety-six of her ninety-nine years in Scottville, a farm town not far from Lake Michigan. She saw most of her children weekly, if not daily - at the Scottville bank where my Aunt Ruth worked, at the creamery across the street, owned by my Uncle Polly.

But my father, mother, brothers and I lived in faraway Detroit, which in those pre-AC, pre-freeway days was a sweltering six-hour drive through muggy countryside and town after trafficky town congested with stoplights, double parked cars and people trying to make left turns. It wasn’t a trip we made lightly, especially in winter when instead of muggy it could be cold and dangerously snowy or slushy.

Unlike most of his siblings, my father left home after high school. He went off to college at Michigan State College (now Michigan State University) and never really came back.

He worked for the same dairy most of his career, at first as a plant supervisor in Flint, and later as a corporate executive in downtown Detroit. He bought a house in the suburbs, joined Oakland Hills Country Club, and bowled Tuesday nights with other Detroit executives at the Detroit Athletic Club. He outgrew Scottville, his rural beginnings, his family’s small town ways, his mother.

That’s the way it often is in our oversized, mobile country. We pack up and move across the country with impunity, putting hundreds, even thousands, of miles between ourselves, our origins and our families.

The impulse runs strong in my family:

• My grandmother and her widowed mother left upper New York State for Scottville in the 1880’s.

• Her husband-to-be, my Grandfather Falconer, and his parents left Glasgow for Scottville in the 1870’s.

• My father left Scottville for Detroit in the 1930’s.

• My brothers and I left Detroit for the West Coast in the 1960’s.

Grandmother, grandfather, father, siblings - we never gave it a second thought. We were all seeking a better life. It’s what we were supposed to do. It was part of being American.

My father was a dutiful son from afar. He visited his mother when he could, and he telephoned her long-distance on Thanksgiving and Christmas. He made sure that we kids visited her often during the summers we spent on a lake near Scottville.

At the end of each summer we made a good-bye visit to Grandma Falconer. Our T-shirts and bathing suits, toothbrushes and combs packed in cardboard boxes and squeezed into the trunk of the Ford, we stopped by my grandmother’s on the way out of town.

We wouldn’t be seeing Grandma again until next summer. She wouldn’t be seeing us again until next summer. Many miles and many months would separate her from her son, and all my grandmother could do about that was stand in her driveway and wave at us as we drove away.

I never knew for sure why my grandmother lingered so long in her driveway, shaded by the tall spreading trees that canopied State Street, where she had lived as a girl, and later - after she and my grandfather lost their farm at the edge of town - as a married woman and a widow. But there she stood, in a flowered cotton housedress that buttoned down the front, the chain of her pince-nez anchored with a gold pin in the waves of her silvery hair.

Did she stand there because she wanted to reassure us that her love was truly steadfast? Or did she so pine for her beloved son, who lived and worked so far away, that she wanted to drink up those last moments of him as he drove away from her? If the latter, she never mentioned it in my hearing. She was not one to complain.

My grandmother and her seven children, my father at the upper left. Photos c 1960 Ludington Photo Studio.

My grandmother and her seven children, my father at the upper left. Photos c 1960 Ludington Photo Studio.

It’s possible that Grandma was just being polite, seeing us off like that. Small town woman though she was, my grandmother cared about the niceties. “The blade of the knife faces in, toward the plate,” she informed me one summer day as I set the table for her.

But it seemed to me that, driving off like that, we were rejecting her and her small town, nineteenth-century ways. We were leaving her in the dust. And so, out of pity, I made it my job to see to it that, for as long as my grandmother waved and followed us with her eyes, at least one of us - me - would return the look and the wave.

Pressing my two sweaty brothers aside, I’d turn and kneel on the back seat of the Ford and gaze out the back window as my uncomplaining grandmother shrank and disappeared into the distance.

Here in California, when my children were growing up and carpooling to school in the morning, I followed my grandmother’s example. I walked them out of the garage to the driveway to meet their ride. I helped them into their seatbelts, then I stood in the driveway waving good-bye and blowing reassuring kisses until the neighbor’s car disappeared down the hill and around the corner.

When Peter was a baby, same thing. When all the bedtime rituals had been completed, teeth brushed, storybook read, kisses and massages applied and lights turned off, it was I, not Peter, who drew out the final good-night. Heading for the door, I blew kisses across the room. And closing the door behind me, I popped my hand through the crack to throw one last kiss at my little son.

Peter is twenty-nine now. Months ago, he left California to live in Minnesota with his girlfriend. Like his family before him he’s left home. He’s gone away. He’s taken himself off to a distant place, and has no plans to return any time soon.

The other morning, their holiday visit over, Peter and his girlfriend piled their luggage into Jon’s little silver Toyota for the trip to the airport. Jon started the engine and backed the car onto the driveway. I stood in the garage in my bathrobe waving good-bye.

I don’t know how long my son watched me and waved. But as the garage door dropped between us I felt myself disappear from sight, piece by piece. My face. My hands, mid-wave. The hem of my robe. My slippered feet. Until finally, like my grandmother, I was gone.

© 2010 Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Writing Room: Different From, Different Than - Which Is It?

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

I was at the gym working my pecs and abdominals on the stretching apparatus the other day when I spotted a flyer posted by a local nutritionist. Her name was Helayne Waldman and she was touting her services with some pithy fat facts — and iffy English usage:

“Did you know - belly fat is different than other fat.”

Different than?

Helayne Waldman's poster got some sweaty revisions by the pundits at the gym. Some say than. Some say from.

Helayne Waldman's poster got some revisions from the sweaty English usage pundits at the gym.

At least one sweaty pundit had taken issue with Helayne’s belly fat sentence. Her typed “than” had been crossed out and replaced with a handwritten “from.”

Now it read:  ”Belly fat is different from other fat.”

But the dispute didn’t end there. Someone else came along and changed the sentence back to: “Belly fat is different than other fat.”

I was gratified. Apparently I’m not the only English speaker on the planet befuddled by the “different from/different than” question. Despite my numerous years at typewriter and keyboard, I still don’t know my “froms” from my “thans.”

At the end of my senior year at Birmingham (Michigan) High School, my English teacher, Freda Richards, handed out a sheet of paper with a list of tricky Englishisms. One of the items on her list was “different from.” Or was it “different than?” I can’t remember.

Unfortunately, I lost Mrs. Richard’s list when I went off to college, and I’ve been ruing my carelessness ever since. Which was it? “Different than?” Or “different from?”

Writing a blog post just last week I was stumped. Again. Should I write, “My father was different from his brothers and sisters?” Or, “My father was different than his brothers and sisters?”

I followed a fine old journalistic tradition - I hid my ignorance by writing around the problem. I came up with, ”Unlike most of his siblings, my father left home after high school.”

But when Helayne’s belly fat poster appeared before me at the gym, mid-stretch, I knew it was time to get a handle on the issue once and for all. Back in my writing room I headed for my shelf of reference books and scanned the indexes.

• My son’s high school grammar book -  John E. Warriner’s ubiquitous English Grammar and Composition. No help.

• My favorite, the elegant Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace, by the University of Chicago’s Joseph M. Williams. Nope.

• That old stand-by, The Elements of Style, by William Strunk, Jr., and E.B. White. Not much help. “Different from” is tersely ruled OK, but nothing’s said about “different than.”

• The Associated Press Stylebook and Libel Manual. Ditto.

Finally, I pulled out an old book that my New York roommate had given me for Christmas way back in the ’60s. It was The Careful Writer. The author was Theodore M. Bernstein, then the assistant managing editor of the New York Times and formerly an associate professor at the Columbia School of Journalism.

And there it was on page 139 - an entry labeled “Different From, Different Than” - situated happily between Mr. Bernstein’s thoughts on “Different” and “Differentiate.”

To my relief, I saw that the “different from” vs. “different than” issue was not a simple one. The illustrious Mr. Bernstein had devoted a full three pages to its complexities. My life-long confusion, it turned out, was justified.

Here’s what I learned:

First, says Mr. Bernstein, you’ll never be wrong if you stick to “different from.” There’s generally no argument about the okayness of “different from.”

It’s “different than” that raises the questions.

Mr. Bernstein points out that the following sentence makes sense, technically: “The grass is greener than the leaves are green.”

But this one does not: “Boys are different than girls are different.”

In other words, “different” does not really function as a comparative adjective the way such words as greener, fatter, sweatier and hairier do. Thus, for most purposes, “different than” is not a logical choice.

But, continues Mr. Bernstein, sometimes “different than” is actually the way to go. He offers this sentence from Cardinal Newman: “It has possessed me in a different way than ever before.”

In the Cardinal Newman sentence, “than” is followed by a clause. If the writer were to use “different from,” the clause would have to be rewritten, with awkward, verbose results: “It has possessed me in a different way from the way in which it ever before did.”

And so, after so many years of shirking the question, I finally have myself a rule of thumb: It’s ”different from” unless “different” is followed by a clause or a clause fragment.

From now on I’m sticking to “from.” When “different than” is called for, I’m hoping my common sense will kick in and I’ll notice that this situation is different from most, and I’ll write the sentence in a different way than I normally would.

Thank you Mr. Bernstein. I have tacked a photocopy of your “Different From, Different Than” entry on the gym bulletin board next to Helayne’s poster. That done, I’m returning my attention to my belly fat.

© 2010 Barbara Falconer Newhall

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in Book Openers, The Writing Room | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Case of the Human Condition: Build a Wind Farm — Wreck Lake Michigan

Lake Michigan as it is and has been for since my great-grandparents' time. Photo C 2007 B.F. Newhall

Lake Michigan as it is and has been for since my great-grandparents' time. You can't see across this lake. It's 118 miles wide, and all you can see is water -- all the way to the horizon. Photo C 2007 B.F. Newhall

By Barbara Falconer Newhall

I saw the map and burst into tears.

 It broke my heart.

Windmills, a hundred square miles of them, are being proposed for Lake Michigan - a couple miles off shore. In the lake.

Beautiful, serene, life-giving Lake Michigan.

My cousin had sent me the link to the website. She wanted me to know that Scandia Wind LLC of Sweden was proposing to build 200 off-shore wind turbines near Pentwater, Michigan - blighting what for me and for a lot of other people is the most beautiful spot on Earth: the stretch of Lake Michigan north of Grand Rapids between Ludington and Silver Lake.

If built, the Scandia Aegir Project would be the biggest off-shore wind farm in the world.

Windmills, a lot of them - at the exact spot I spent my summers as a kid. Where my father was born and is buried. Where he and my mother met. Where grandparents and great-grandparents on both sides of the family lived, reared children and died.

I’m not objecting to wind turbines. Windmills are a great source of clean, sustainable energy. I’ve seen them and they are beautiful in the way so many man-made structures are beautiful - the Golden Gate Bridge, the Brooklyn Bridge, Grand Central Station.

The Altamont Pass here in the San Francisco Bay Area is dotted with thousands of wind turbines. Every time we drive past those tall, steely towers  facing resolutely west to capture the winds coming in off the Pacific, they take my breath away. They are stunning.

But they don’t belong on - in - Lake Michigan.

I’m a seriously green person. People make fun of how green I am.

The last time my husband and I bought cars, we both opted for hybrids, at considerable extra expense. We also have those (to me awful) CFL light bulbs all over the house.

Not only that, we have five - count ‘em five - different waste cans in our kitchen, one for plastic bags, one for paper, one for bottles and cans, one for compost and one - very small can - for actual trash that can’t be recycled here in Oakland.

Every time I toss a tea bag into the compost bin, I think, I’m doing this for my planet. I’m doing it for Lake Michigan.

I know. Lake Michigan is two thousand miles from our house in Oakland. My old tea bag has no chance of ending up anywhere near Michigan, let alone in Lake Michigan.

But, I think as I so carefully send the tea bag off to be composted, that if I take care of California, hopefully, maybe, with any luck, somebody back home will take care of Lake Michigan.

My green credentials established, I will now rant and weep at the prospect of wind turbines along the coast of my beloved Lake Michigan.

There are all kinds of solid, sensible arguments against this project. The people at a citizens group called the Lake Michigan P.O.W.E.R. Coalition (Protect Our Water, Economy and Resources) have spelled them out intelligently on their website.

The sight of hundreds of wind turbines spinning on the lake can do serious damage to the local tourist industry, they point out, as well as endanger local water life, boating and fishing. And it’s not at all clear that the project will bring anything but temporary, unskilled jobs to the area.

I would say, yes we need clean energy. Yes, we need alternatives to coal, nuclear energy and foreign oil. But - is endangering and defacing Lake Michigan and turning 100 square miles of it into an industrial district the answer?

What do we mean by green, anyway?

Some will say this is just another case of NIMBY — Not in my back yard.

But Lake Michigan is not my back yard.

Lake Michigan is not a back yard.

It is a natural wonder as precious as Yosemite Valley, the Grand Canyon, Niagara Falls, Old Faithful.

It’s Nature with a capital N. It is the natural world at its most exquisite. It a vibrant, loving presence that has nourished the spirits of the people who have lived along its shores for millennia. 

It’s a place where people finish dinner and, instead of going to a movie or watching TV, walk down to the beach with their folding chairs to sit and watch the sun set - and remind themselves that they live in a world created by an extravagant God.

Whether we allow this particular - to me holy - place on earth to be violated by a 100-mile-square stand of wind turbines towering 300 feet above the lake, beautiful as those turbines can be in their own steely, graceful way, is not a subject I’m willing to debate.

Would Californians countenance a stand of wind turbines atop Half Dome or on the mountains around Lake Tahoe? Would Floridians allow them anywhere near the Florida Keys or the Everglades? For that matter, would the Swedes allow them on the beautiful lakes that wind their ways through Stockholm?

Automobiles. iPhones. Microwaves. Dishwashers. What’s the point of all that energy-consuming stuff if, once we have arrived at our destinations, texted our friends, nuked the dinner and dispatched the dirty dishes — what’s the point if there’s no beauty left in the world?

© 2010 Barbara Falconer Newhall — Permission granted to reprint and reuse this column, with credit to Barbara Falconer Newhall and link to this website, http://BarbaraFalconerNewhall.com/  Thanks.

Below: The map that made me cry, and how the wind turbines might look from the shores of Lake Michigan.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition, GodsBigBlog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Want to Read More? You Can Subscribe to My Blog

If you’d like to get my posts regularly — just click on that big orange button to your right and subscribe. Unfortunately, the Subscribe button does not usually work for AOL users. Sorry!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Leave a comment

A Case of the Human Condition: Another Threat to Lake Michigan — Asian Carp

My Michigan friends are emailing me about the Asian carp threatening to enter Lake Michigan and the other Great Lakes from the Illinois canal system. The carp would seriously endanger fish and other wildlife in the Lakes and local rivers.

Read more at www.stopasiancarp.com 

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in A Case of the Human Condition | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment